Boston’s Derrick White and Denver’s Aaron Gordon may be high-end examples, but does Dallas make the Finals last season without journeyman Derrick Jones Jr.? Does Miami make it the year before without Caleb Martin?

With that in mind, here is Part One of my Finding a Role Introduction for this season, where I’ll be tracking some of the league’s rising (potential) difference-makers. We live in the here and now, of course, focusing on how Player X can earn more minutes and dollars by increasing his value to his current team, but keep in mind the long-term undercurrent: Can these guys show up as high-end contributors on championship-level teams? How are they going to get there?

Additionally, this season’s installments of Finding a Role would not be possible without crowdscout.net, the brainchild of Swish Theory co-founder Eric Weiss (and company), a truly game-changing way to watch and catalogue film from around the NBA.

Click on the linked playlists for the CrowdScout Experience, and more context on each of these players.

Tari Eason

After being selected 17th overall in the 2022 NBA Draft by the Houston Rockets, Tari Eason immediately made a name for himself by playing real hard and annoying the hell out of most of his opponents throughout his rookie season. However, his sophomore season was ended after just 22 appearances due to lower-leg injury troubles. First a stress fracture, then a surgery to address a benign growth in his shin. Not ideal.

But that sample of play — in addition to his start in 2024-25 — is more than enough to define Eason within Houston’s over-crowded room of young players a leap or two away from changing their careers.

Offense: Bow-Tyer (playlist)

Tari Eason is built like an athlete. He’s listed as 6’8″ with a 7’2″ wingspan, and between that and his aggressive defensive style, which we’ll cover, he’s subject to type-casting on offense. Yes, he can crash the glass and finish transition opportunities above-the-rim, but Eason has room to grow into a connective role on that end. Throughout his first two seasons, he showed considerable court-mapping and decision-making prowess despite a relative lack of possessing the ball.

This cut-and-kick creates a corner-three for Houston, and while he perhaps misses a real tough, high-value dump-off to Alperen Şengün, it showcases some skills Eason should tap into more:

Tari will make to the rim if he sees the back of his defender’s head, and he can find the open shooters in transition. This play stands out not because it’s anything ground-breaking, but because he identifies where the advantage will be early. The drive-and-kick itself becomes pretty simple:

There’s really no reason, then, for his career-assist-rate to be hovering below 8%. Eason doesn’t have to be late-career Andre Iguodala in year three, but he’s shown too much court-awareness to have none of his passing stats pop. Yes, he often stands in the corner in Houston’s half-court offense, but ending the closeouts he does attack with extra passes and even higher-value looks for teammates has to be a focus.

However, it bodes well that Eason is finishing strong at the rim to start 2024-25, perhaps invigorated by a successful rehab process. Cleaning the Glass is tracking him at 48-of-66, or 73% on shots at the rim this season, up from his previous career-mark of 56% on 415 attempts.

It’s early. But Eason looks to be a merely competent 3-point threat on low volume, shooting in the mid-30s without many attempts off the dribble or off movement (though it’s worth noting he is just 250 attempts into his career).

Eason has never had a problem getting to the paint, but he hasn’t always pressed the right button to get there. Occasionally he doesn’t leverage his physicality into an advantage, opting for a slow-step or euro type of finish that diminishes his athletic traits. Often times, he’s stunted by a lack of flexibility in his handle, forced to pick the ball up one dribble too soon.

For now, though, he’s solving the issue, and flashing signs of tying the bow on top of Houston’s offense. He can handle in transition, cut to the rim or get there off a closeout or offensive board, and for now, he’s finishing those possessions. Becoming a more consistent passer is the key, and that’ll open up opportunities to get him in the short-roll as a screener or ball-handler in some inverted actions.

Defense: Ball-Hawk (playlist)

Simple. He rebounds everything, and yeah, he may foul a lot, but Eason is currently in the 100th percentile for steal- and block-rate for his position in 2024-25, per Cleaning the Glass. Passing lanes, pick-pockets, swipe-downs, contests as the low-man, you name it, Tari does it.

There is a flip-side, in that he’s occasionally beat on his gambling, and he’s not always in the right positions when it comes to scramble-mode or communicating with his teammates. Last season, playing against the Indiana Pacers, Eason was occasionally tasked with guarding Buddy Hield. He did okay, but it showed that his skillset is more tailored to helping off a non-shooting threat rather than being responsible for the deadliest shooter on the floor. On this play, he survives poor screen-navigation at first, though that’s an admittedly bigger problem than biting on the ball-fake when helps on a drive:

(It’s tough to help off Buddy Hield.)

Houston hasn’t always had the rim-protection to insulate some of his gambling tendencies, though Şengün is looking sturdier in 2024-25 but Eason’s ball-hawking nature is too valuable to be constricted.

This end of the floor is a bit easier to predict for Tari Eason. Unless he’s playing in handcuffs, he’s going to rack up the deflections as a long-armed athlete with plus-anticipation skills. Molding those desirable skills into a team-context where he can more comfortably navigate switches and make funky rotations is an obvious key for him.

Playlist: https://crowdscout.net/p?p=01934941-a5b0-7990-9c53-069a08998d21&i=3329457)

Gradey Dick

Gradey Dick is here to shoot the rock.

Offense: Loose Dynamite (Playlist)

He’s 6’7″ with a high release point, and has shown stretches of being the shot-maker the Toronto Raptors envisioned when they took him out of University of Kansas in the 2023 NBA Draft. As with any shooter, Dick needs to improve on the margins: making the right choice when defenses run him off the 3-point line, not falling too in love with that mid-range pull-up, finishing at the rim, et cetera.

But Gradey has scored 25-plus points five times in his career, and they’ve all come in the early stages of the 2024-25 season. Opportunity has abounded with Scottie Barnes and others missing considerable time for Toronto, but think about the archetype here. Gradey didn’t just stand in the corner and wait to capitalize on advantages that weren’t created, he went out and got 20 shots.

Dick’s shown some malleability off that high release-point, and the anticipation/hand-eye to convert opportunies that he otherwise couldn’t, given a fairly uninspiring athletic profile. On this pair of buckets, he first push-dribbles through a dig, then drops a tough turnaround over Rudy Gobert before floating a moon-ball over him the next time down:

Is this Dick’s ideal shot-profile? No. Does it indicate that he get create real looks for himself outside the limited context of a less threatening stand-in-the-corner white guy? Absolutely.

Gradey’s always going to be a little reliant on organized offense to get his looks off; pin-downs with correct spacing, setting a ball-screen -> coming off a flare, etc. However, on a healthy Raptors team with Scottie Barnes, RJ Barrett, and Immanuel Quickley most often toting the rock, Gradey’s gonna need to find other ways to get his shots off. His growing ability to find his spots bodes well.

Of course, making the right decisions when attacking closeouts is paramount, but look for Gradey to keep firing all sorts of 3-point looks. Hopefully, he can use his anticipation and hand-eye skills to find crevasses to get to the rim a tad more, though that floater will be a real weapon for years to come. Ideally, Gradey Dick is a loose stick of dynamite; handle him with improper care and watch your house burn down.

Defense: Chain Link (Playlist)

Gradey Dick isn’t going to become a lockdown defender on the ball, but he’s going to have to bleed a little less on the perimeter. His foot-speed and short-space explosiveness is just alright, so it’s tough when the NBA’s shiftiest guards reject screens on him and whatnot. Here, he deftly switches a screen and then chases Anthony Edwards, of all people, through another one, but Ant dusts him with a simple-jab:

Of course, Gradey Dick cannot give up baseline on this play, and that worry is a part of what sends him flying, in addition to, you know. That play is the result of an off-ball switch, and while the Toronto Raptors won’t ask Gradey Dick to guard all the opponent’s most threatening players, he’ll be put in some uncomfortable situations.

In the meantime, Gradey Dick has to continue communicating with his teammates and showing in the right spots, something he’s done a nice job of for a player early in his second season.

Vince Williams Jr.

Vince Williams Jr. missed the first month of the Memphis Grizzlies season recovering from a stress fracture in his tibia, then returned for three games before spraining his ankle, which will cause him to miss around another month of action. Tough times for one of the league’s funkiest third-year players.

Offense: Gap Filler (Playlist)

In the beginning of the 2023-24 season, the Memphis Grizzlies deployed Vince as a fairly typical wing who was just getting his feet wet with consistent rotational minutes. Then, as the injuries continued to mount and Vince’s skillset became a bit clearer, he blossomed into something of a point-forward, racking up high-assist totals throughout the spring. It’s easy to see why:

Vince struggles to truly separate/blow by defenders with a live-dribble, but if there is an advantage available to him, he will make any sort of pass to get it done. ‘Ambitious’ is the word that comes to mind.

Vince could use a few more live-dribble counters to get to his spots; right now, he’s almost exclusively able to create out of dribble-handoffs or in transition rather than straight pick-and-roll. However, he did shoot 39% from deep as a willing 3-point shooter in 2023-24, perhaps a bit over his head but more than enough to draw closeouts and give his best skills and opportunity to shine.

In the half-court, he’s either taking those looks (and will pull off the dribble if his defender goes far under the screen) or trying to get all the way to the rim. Because Vince is not the most reactive ball-handler, he has trouble navigating tight spaces. While that limits his ability to consistently lay the ball up, his approach is at least partly why Memphis felt so comfortable giving him more responsibility.

Vince will make sure Memphis achieves its desired shot-profile if the ball is in his hands. He will either pass to or shoot from the high-value areas of the court. Sure, he can cut and shoot off-the-ball sufficiently; he’ll make inspiring extra passes. But Vince flies with some decision-making on his shoulders; the short-term question is how he’s going to do this while playing next to Ja Morant, Jaren Jackson Jr., Desmond Bane, and even the vaguely similar Marcus Smart.

Defense: Playmaker (Playlist)

I described Vince Williams Jr. as a funky third-year player not just as a term of admiration for his offensive play-style, but his defense too. Memphis tasked Vince with face-guarding their opponent’s best player for damn-near full games last season. From Kyrie Irving to Kevin Durant, Vince was guarding his man often with his back turned to the ball, almost like the football player he’s built like.

This encapsulates the VWJ experience on defense; he’s not always the most nimble at the point-of-attack, and he’s not racking up the deflections quite like Tari Eason, but he is a playmaker nonetheless. Vince is fantastic at contesting shots all over the court, but his verticality and ridiculous +7 wingspan really plays at the rim:

Despite his fundamentally sound skills there, Vince can be a bit of a risk-taker on the perimeter, and frequent gambles and pokes at the ball puncture holes in his point-of-attack defense. A tad too often, offensive players are able to create space by bumping him off course, surprising given his frame and physicality when sticking to guys off the ball.

Where should his skillset meet his role? Indeed, he is a playmaker on defense, with active hands, strong anticipation skills, and an ability to offer secondary rim-protection, but perhaps it is telling that Memphis stuck him on so many bona fide perimeter threats last season. Next to Jaren Jackson Jr. and Zach Edey, the Grizzlies may need him to buckle down, get through screens, and move his feet against smaller, shiftier players.

Nearly everything Vince does on a basketball court is interesting, but his role on Memphis’ defense is really something to look out for when he returns from injury.

This has merely been the first part of Finding a Role, 2025. There are a couple boys from Brooklyn I’ve yet to mention, but that will come at a later date.

Meanwhile, I will be re-visiting these three players frequently throughout this season, tracking progress in the aforementioned areas, as they look to establish themselves as upper-middle class NBA players who can make or break a contending front office. Can Gradey Dick’s ancillary offense push a championship-offense over the finish line? Will Tari Eason oversee and control playoff games on both ends of the court? Can Vince Williams Jr. toe the line between experimenting and producing at the highest level?

Those are all long-term questions, but they’ll be answered season-by-season, game-by-game, quarter-by-quarter, and Swish Theory’s Finding a Role series is here to track all of it.

The post Finding a Role: 2024-25 Introduction appeared first on Swish Theory.

For this, second piece, I’m looking at “Green Flags Only” prospects, freshmen and sophomore NCAA players who exceeded various statistical minimums and did not see the same kind of linear production decline against the best teams.

With no glaring statistical weaknesses, these prospects do Everything, Everywhere regardless of who they’re playing and at any given moment. The questions we’ll be looking to answer this time are, primarily:

1. Do they have an extra gear to show the special?
2. Will their game translate in the same way against NBA competition?

They were able to produce all over and consistently, but how big are those margins, and where might they dominate? Do they have star potential or just consistency? Do they even have that? The answers varied widely:

Jarace Walker (Houston, 7.7 BPM)

Jarace is a tricky evaluation given the contrasts of the obvious with the dubious. Let’s start there:

• The obvious
  • Jarace is an elite passer
  • Jarace is elite at reading an offense
  • Jarace has elite positioning
  • Jarace can dribble and shoot better than most at his position
• The dubious
  • Jarace can’t get to the rim consistently
  • Jarace doesn’t have much burst
  • Jarace takes a while to leap

The latter qualities were masked by his fantastic athletic testing in a controlled setting, with one of the best verticals at the Combine. But the implementation of that in-game is a question of degree that requires close film watching. Let’s dig in.

Jarace is one of the best processors of what is happening on the court in this class, and, with size, strength and some dribble / pass / shoot skill, is an obvious and safe bet to be positive on an NBA floor.

The obvious is, in fact, so obvious it can be easy to underestimate. At any given point, Jarace makes crosscourt reads look simple, is able to rotate into advantageous spot ahead of NCAA competition, and whips passes to open shooters at the perfect time. He knows how to use eye manipulation to create openings, and understands when the opponent is about to over-rotate.

I have no issue projecting Jarace’s strengths conveying at the next level. At 6’6.5’’ with a 7’2.5’’ wingspan, 97^th percentile standing vert, 83^rd percentile lane agility and 78^th percentile sprint scores at the combine, Walker certainly has the athletic build to capitalize on them.

His statistical profile was elite, particularly his combination of 12% assist rate, 6.2% block rate, 2.2% steal rate and 38% shooting on 138 midrange attempts, the majority of which were unassisted. Being able to hit difficult shots while also reading the floor at a high level on both ends is a good formula for success. Bobby Portis at Arkansas is the only comparable freshman for that combination of stats (if you relax the criteria, Jabari Parker, Terrence Jones, Demarcus Cousins and Mo Harkless appear), another toolsy, scheme-versatile big wing/small big but not the level of passer as Jarace.

So, Jarace’s floor is safe – how about his ceiling?

That is where the dubious comes in. The combination of lack of elite burst and longer leaping load time have lead to overreliance on his floater and pull-up, and, for an otherwise highly crafty player, a surprising lack thereof on drives. Without an initial edge even in NCAA against mediocre competition on drives, Jarace is often forced to bail out early, limiting the utility of his passing as well.

The most damning indicator is his mere 0.24 rate of free throws to shot attempts: this would be the worst mark among that comp set I listed above, with Mo Harkless as closest at 0.33 and Demarcus Cousins at the peak of 0.73.

While we’re being greedy, that lack of burst limits what could have been a DPOY-degree of upside on defense. Jarace is always aware of long rotations he could make, but not always capable of making them physically. He is always first to spot a development, contributing to elite stock rates regardless, but could have been a true monster with a more rapid first step and a bit more agility.

Where we are left is an obviously great connector prospect who also has shotmaking and primary distributor upside, in addition to some rim protection ability. That is an extremely safe bet in the top 10. If he is able to become a little bit quicker and a little more mobile, he could easily clear top 5 value.

Jordan Hawkins (UConn, 7.4 BPM)

The proof of Jordan Hawkins being NBA-ready also hits you over the head: he was the best player on a national championship team where he filled his role admirably. That role also slots easily into any team, being off-ball centric, as scalable as you want.

The primary selling point for Hawkins is the shot, particularly off of movement. Off the catch he took 222 threes and made 91 of them (41%). His 7.6 points per game shooting off the catch was top 20 in the country, and the primary kill shot for the nation’s best team. Hawkins flew around screens and reorganized in an instant, always committing to his follow through.

That shot will translate to the next level, as will Hawkins’ general approach to the game. He plays very hard, more physical than you’d expect for what is often a more cosmetic archetype. The issue is he is small, listed at 6’5’’ but often unable to deter shots from even smaller wings. He gets in the right position but it often does not matter, begging questions of whether he would be targeted in high stakes NBA circumstances.

He also has little star path outside of his shotmaking. The handle is not good for a guard, though he is savvy enough to limit those occasions to when necessary. This brings me to my favorite part of Hawkins’ game: he is not afraid to attack whatever space the opponent gives him, whether it’s into a midrange pullup or all the way to the basket. The tools to get there or finish when he arrives are not fantastic, but his shooting gravity is enough that the lanes should be wide.

I would love to consider Hawkins a top 20 prospect simply by how he plays the game and how reliable it is to be useful to an NBA team, and even good ones. Off-ball scoring at his level without obvious vulnerabilities makes him a fit with all 30 NBA teams. But when searching for star ceilings, I am less compelled to see it in Hawkins unless he reaches a comfort level with the handle to seek out more midrange opportunities. It’s possible, but not my favorite bet considering a loaded top 20.

Cason Wallace (Kentucky, 7.0 BPM)

No player has a wider gap between value on the court and scarcity of skillset than Cason. The value proposition is strong: he can defend any guard or small wing, sniffing out actions and making as consistent an impact as any guard in the class; he can provide some offensive value all over, whether passing, midrange floaters, screensetting, catch and shoot. But when it comes to grasping for rarity, I struggle to see as immediate of star scarcity as others in the lottery.

Let’s take a step back. Cason Wallace is a very, very good basketball player. It is rare to have a guard connector prospect of his ability in a class. He is as sound as you’ll find as far as hand placement and positioning, surely obnoxious to be guarded by. He is more didactic on offense, a table setter with some athletic and dribble pass shoot skills to rely on.

I am sure Wallace will be a good NBA player. The question we are here to ask, uncomfortable but necessary near the top, is how rare his qualities are.

The rarest aspect of his game is simply its combination of factors, and why he is a clear top 20 prospect in my mind. But the dominant factors may be lacking when benchmarking against odds of being a top 2 player on a title team. It’s a high bar, but one we have to focus on.

There are many avenues for Cason to reach that, all of which are debatable in likelihood:

• Ride the floater to primary or secondary scoring
• Continue to progress as an offensive conductor
• Add additional finishing craft to broaden scoring opportunities
• Be that good of a shutdown defender

I struggle, however, to see any of these avenues as likely in their own right, even if surely will progress at least somewhat. With the recent offensive explosion where 110 offensive ratings are pedestrian, I struggle to see where Cason stands out (again, relative to star upside). His handle and creativity attacking the rim are fairly straightforward, indicated by his 0.22 free throw to field goal attempt rate and only 24% of attempts coming at the rim.

Wallace’s stats exceed dominant thresholds for connector equity: 2.0 assist to turnover ratio, 24% assist rate, 3.7% steal rate and 54% true shooting is a pristine resume for a high major freshman (Dennis Smith Jr., Wade Baldwin, Jrue Holiday and Shabazz Napier are only ones in vicinity) but I want to find the easy. Cason is highly likely to make everything a bit harder for his opponent, but I struggle to see the dominant.

You know what, as I write this and review the clips…you can become a star through the lack of mistakes as well. Cason has that path. It’s not common to reach it through simply doing every little thing on the court you’ve asked well without a truly dominant area, but maybe that’s exactly where Cason Wallace’s dominance lies.

Gradey Dick (Kansas, 6.5 BPM)

My quick and easy pitch for Gradey is this: he will be your team’s best shooter, and not your worst defender, maybe not even second worst. But we can begin with the shot.

Gradey has all the hallmarks of what I look for in a sharpshooter: smooth and consistent release; high peak and quickly; hunts for it off movement; seems to enjoy shooting it. He is a very tough cover, able at 6’6.25’’ and 6’8.75’’ wingspan to shoot it over opponent off the move, especially with his quirky shot. He sets it through his gather at about the release height, so when he begins the second motion it’s quick and effortless. Think Klay Thompson’s but with less dip and a bit more mechanical.

The handle is the obvious swing skill. Dick is quite coordinated at his size, also evidenced by his active choreography on Tik Tok, able to take advantage of his shooting gravity but ducking through tight closeouts and resetting into his shot. For that reason I have quite high hopes in him as a midrange pull-up threat, simply too good of a shooter and too nimble on his feet to not be. The handle is simple but functional, with reason to think more reps will mean more progress (simply waiting for the ball was enough to fill it up at Kansas as the primary shooting threat on the team).

On defense, he uses his length exceptionally well and, more importantly, is very obviously always seeking out a way to have an impact. When he swats to block shots it’s ferociously, when he sees a loose ball he dives, and he has the coordination to maximize his length where you wouldn’t expect.

Gradey Dick, to me, is a very safe top 10 pick. Shooting is shooting, is shooting, and Gradey is as confident as I can get in a 40%+ high volume spot up threat. To then have confidence in some defense, some handle, lots of effort on top of that? In my opinion, there is a good case for him as early as #5.

Anthony Black (Arkansas, 5.9)

Ant is an obvious candidate to stick in the league as a physical connector. As Arkansas’ driving force (especially when Nick Smith Jr. was out) – the team was +22 net rating with Ant on compared to +9 with him off – Black put up stats similar to Bruce Brown as a freshman at Florida:

Anthony Black / Bruce Brown

• 22% / 22% USG
• 55% / 56% TS
• 21% / 21% AST
• 1.3 / 1.6 A:TO
• 3.4 / 2.9 STL%
• 1.9 / 1.9 BLK%
• 93-148 (63%) / 90-144 (63%) at rim
• 32% / 21% midrange
• 71% / 74% FT%
• 30% / 35% 3P%
• 58 / 41 FTAR

A more physically daunting Bruce Brown is about as close of a comparison as I can get in this class, a player constantly on the swerve and able to exert themselves no matter the task. Not only are they toolsy, but take pride in being so. Black can be seen throwing his body against whatever opponent is nearest, never turning down an opportunity to set a flare screen or tag a roller: Ant is a gamer.

It’s not all perfect, and, much like Bruce Brown, it may be worth asking what the star upside is even as appreciating all that makes them such useful players. Ant has many routes to the rim, excellent at alternating footwork to parry past second line defenders. But he often struggles to get past that first one, shiftier than he is bursty and more functional in handle than magician.

The shot isn’t great, as a possession ending in an Ant Black three is unlikely to be good offense in the NBA, but Ant’s ability to stay on a swivel will give him opportunities to connect. His adherence to right-playism means if he’s open he’ll be taking the ball to the basket, if others are open he’ll be slinging it as soon as he can, if there’s a wide to keep the play going in your favor, he’ll sniff it out.

The offense could be a struggle in the wrong system, one that either tries to let him beat his man off the dribble bringing the ball up or doesn’t allow him to move throughout the half court. But I love betting on reaction time x size x skill, as Ant will have endless opportunities to make a difference. He’ll find his way on the floor, but may need to strike the right conditions to truly become a star.

Kobe Bufkin (Michigan, 5.8 BPM)

Of anyone on this list, Bufkin feels like could belong on the Whiteboard prospect list. His dynamic trait is his driving ability, with long stride lengths and finishing craft. He is particularly adept at finishing from oblique angles while extending past his defender, shooting past and pushing or finger rolling the ball to land gently above the rim. That is an NBA level skill.

I would feel much better about that selling point if it were paired with a complete game as Bufkin’s presence on this list suggests. He’s close, an adept connective passer and generally active across the court. But his lack of any physical presence on the interior presents an obvious point of weakness that could be a risk in high leverage matchups.

Bufkin only weighs 187 pounds, unable to hold space with a lanky frame or catch up after being screened. That makes the sell tougher for a combo guard who can likely only guard true point guards. But Bufkin is still a three level scoring threat, efficient on solid volume everywhere, and perhaps just good enough of a shooter and passer to be that difficult to cover.

Players with the ability to score from three, midrange pull-ups or drives to the rim are always coveted. It may also be possible for Bufkin to add the strength needed to not be targeted by an offense, or use his anticipatory abilities to compensate. I currently have Bufkin slated as a mid-to-late first prospect, though perhaps is the last on my board with true top 3 potential for a good team if things break the right way.

Jett Howard (Michigan, 4.3)

Jett, coach Juwan’s son, made a ton of threes this season. At 14 per 100 possessions, Howard made 37% and self-created one of every four. Funnily enough, watching the tape you could imagine those numbers rising even higher.

Howard is unbelievably comfortable getting into his shot no matter the context. Although not without flaws – we’ll get into those later – he has the exact type of athleticism where he can rebalance into his pocket in an instant no matter from what position. His form is about ideal, following through consistently and dedicated about his footwork.

Adding on to his flamethrower decal, Jett is also an exceptional passer with good handle. He is both accurate and decisive, limited only by his negative first step where his handle is often dedicated to buying time more than taking space.

This all adds up to a dynamo of an offensive player who will be difficult to keep from scoring, regardless of role. He is shy attacking the basket with a narrow frame, but touch is feathery enough that even a 15-foot floater feels like an acceptable shot.

Now, the defense. Jett is the most significant difference between offense and defense of all prospects i’ve covered so far, as limited in physicality he can provide as well as prone to fall asleep or be a step slow getting around screens.

What’s extremely encouraging, and helped me gain comfort with him as a lotto pick is he did show signs of wanting to use his full wing size. His blocks improved from nonexistent to occasional, making up for the small guard count of rebounds. He was also playing on sprained ankles most of the season, looking more present of a presence in his high school years.

I can’t wait to watch Jett Howard in the NBA. His shot would be my favorite in the class if Gradey Dick wasn’t in it, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he ended up its best shooter, or even its best scorer (outside of Wemby). The shooting will stick fast, I just hope the defense is good enough to keep him stuck in.

Amari Bailey (UCLA, 3.9 BPM)

Amari earns the final spot here due to his ability to pop up all over the court, with good defense (2.5% steal rate and 1.4% block rate with few fouls) and adequate passing (15% assist rate, 0.9), rebounding (13% defensive rate, 4% offensive). While he only averaged 11 points per game, he was able to score at the rim (77-118), midrange (37-101) and three (21-54) over 30 games.

Positionally, Amari is a clear combo guard, with defensive ground coverage his calling card. Bailey’s stance is ideal, and as always active is able to pivot from distance to distance in an instant. At only 6’3.25’’ with a 6’7’’ wingspan, there will be big guard/small wing assignments Bailey can’t handle, as opponent could still often shoot over him at the NCAA level. But he will be an exceptional glue guy.

I struggle to see Bailey as worth a pick in the first half of the first round, but could provide a versatile skillset to a competitive team towards the end of the first. The swing skill is the pull-up, looking fluid here and there as Bailey is quite fluid of an athlete overall. The mechanics are fine but inconsistent, as seen in his merely decent percentages. He has starter potential, as I buy him finding time with his activity and really embodying the essence of this category.

The post The 2023 NBA Draft’s “Everything Everywhere” Prospects appeared first on Swish Theory.

A 5-star recruit freshman from Sunrise Christian Academy, Gradey Dick is the definition of a nuclear shooter. After building up a reputation as one of the top offensive weapons in his high school class he has lived up to the hype at Kansas, shooting 40% from 3pt while being the 2nd leading scorer (14.1 PPG) for the #1 seeded Kansas Jayhawks. His size and complimentary skills help make him more than “just a shooter”, but there are still some clear limitations to his game.

Offense:

As previously mentioned, the skill that drives the majority of Gradey’s value is his knockdown shooting. He’s an elite off ball threat with the size and shot versatility to get his shot off in a variety of settings off the ball. He’s not overly creative from a standstill with the ball in his hands, but he’s shown the ability to beat closeouts with 1-2 dribble pull ups or straight line drives to the rim. If you wanted to critique him as a shooter, he hasn’t quite mastered the Kevin Huerter/Klay Thompson movement 3 off a dead sprint, and has been slowed down at times by teams aggressively face guarding him; but that’s nitpicking what otherwise is an elite shooting prospect.

Gradey also possesses other plus-qualities on the offensive end, namely connective passing and touch finishes at the rim, and they pair really well with the gravity his shooting draws. Gradey doesn’t have the burst or strength to consistently get to the rim off a standstill and take advantage of his finishing prowess that way, but the way he forces defenses to guard him on the perimeter due to the threat he brings as a shooter gives him easier lanes to the rim than a vast majority of players.

Defense:

The defensive end of the floor is where Gradey struggles a bit more. Despite possessing good height for a perimeter player at 6’7, Dick has a long way to go in terms of filling out his frame, and right now guys can power through him even when he’s in good position. The frame is something you hope he can improve over time, as he’s just 19 years old, but that remains to be seen. He also can be a step slow against quicker guards out on the perimeter.

The good news for Gradey is that there are some positives for him on the defensive end. For one, he above average length for a perimeter defender and he can improve at taking advantage of his length to help make up for his short comings in other areas. He also made notable strides throughout the course of the season. He still had some issues, but he managed to create more events (blocks/steals) while still cutting down on mistakes as the year progressed.

While there were some ups and downs over the course of his freshman season, Gradey continues to be one of the more straight forward players in this class. His shooting at his size gives him a very bankable NBA skill, and there’s enough flashes of other stuff to get you excited beyond that; but determining exactly what the ceiling is remains the ultimate question with Gradey.

The post Gradey Dick appeared first on Swish Theory.